Pedagogical Change for Developing Inclusive Class Room Practice in Science Learning

Main Article Content

Dr. Manisha Bajpai

Abstract

National Education Policy of Government of India (NEP- 2020) provides valuable insights and recommendations on various aspects of education system that include move towards inclusive and holistic education, “The NEP 2020 is found on the five guiding pillars of Access, Equity, Quality, Affordability and Accountability”. It will prepare our youth to meet the diverse national and global challenges of the present and future. Inclusive education embraces the diversity of students. It acknowledges that every learner is unique, with varying strengths, challenges, learning styles, and cultural backgrounds. Inclusion aims to celebrate these differences and create an environment where all students feel valued and respected. The aim of NEP-20 is to construct learning situations that are approachable to all need and beneficial to achieve educational outcomes, and ultimately to a more equitable society. This paper is humble attempt to discuss the pedagogical change for inclusive classroom in light of recommendations of NEP-20. The paper tries to explore some factors of teaching pedagogy which could be fruitful for implementation of inclusive classroom in terms of equitable

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Manisha Bajpai. (2021). Pedagogical Change for Developing Inclusive Class Room Practice in Science Learning . Journal of Advanced Zoology, 42(02), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v42i02.3268
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Dr. Manisha Bajpai

Principal SAM College, BU Bhopal, 9425607373

References

Ball, S. J. (1994). Education Reform: A critical and post-structural approach.

Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.

Banks, J. A. (1989). Approaches to multicultural reform. Trotter Institute Review, 3(3), 17-19.

Banks, J. A. (1993a). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education, Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4-14.

Banks, J. A. (1993b). Multicultural education: development, dimensions, and challenges.

The Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 22-28.

Banks, J. A. (1993c). Multicultural education: historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3-49. Banks, J A. and Tucker, M. (1998). “Multiculturalism’s Five Dimensions.” NEA Today Online.

Bell, L. & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: process, themes, and impact. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bernacchio, C. & Mullen, M. (2007). Universal Design for Learning. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(2), 167-169.

Gopalkrishnan, R. & Sharma, A. (1998). Education guarantee scheme in Madhya Pradesh: innovative step to universalise education. Economic and Political Weekly, 33 (39), 2546 - 2551.

Government of India. (2015). Constitution of India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Law and Justice.

Government of India Planning Commission. (2014). Report of the expert group to review the methodology for measurement of poverty. New Delhi, India: Government of India.

Goyal, S. & Pandey, P. (2009). How do government and private schools differ? Findings from two large Indian states. South Asia Human Development Sector Report, 30.

Jha, M. M. (2005). Inclusive education and the common school in India. In C. S. Mohapatra (Ed.), Disability management in India: changes and commitments (160-171). Secunderabad, India: National Institute for the Mentally Handicapped.

Kalyanpur, M. (2008), Equality, quality and quantity: challenges in inclusive education policy and service provision in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12 (3), 243-262.

Leclercq, F. (2003). Education guarantee scheme and primary schooling in Madhya Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(19), 1855-1869.

Miles, M. (2002). Community and individual responses to disablement in South Asian histories: Old traditions, new myths. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 13(2), 1-16.

Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (1998). National policy on education. New Delhi, India: Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2009). The right of children to free and compulsory education act. New Delhi, India: Government of India.

Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2005). Integrated education in India: Challenges and prospects. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(1).

Singal, N. (2006). Inclusive education in India: International concept, national interpreta-tion. International journal of disability, development and education, 53(3), 351-369.

Singal, N. (2009). Education of children with disabilities in India: Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Paris, France: UNESCO Singal, N., & Rouse, M. (2003). 'We do inclusion': practitioner perspectives in some 'inclusive schools' in India. Perspectives in Education, 21(3), 85-97.

Tilak, J. B. (2000). Education poverty in India. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.

Singh, D. (2009) Challenges in Inclusive Education and Service Provisions: Policies and Practices in Indian Context. Challenges in Inclusive Education and Service Provisions, 2, Retieved from http://schoolofeducators.com › Inclusive Education Singh. Y.P., & Agarwal. A. (2015) Problems and prospects of inclusive education in india.

Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/.../273456327_PROBLEMS_ AND_PROSPECTS_OF_N..

Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.