“To See The Effect Of Dry Needling & Manual Stretching In Patients With Piriformis Muscle Syndrome”

Main Article Content

Vinod Chauhan
Dr. Huma Zahoor Ahmed Siddiqui
Dr. Monika Sharma

Abstract

Background: Piriformis Muscle Syndrome (PMS) is a neuromuscular condition that can cause significant pain and functional impairment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of dry needling and manual stretching in managing PMS, focusing on pain intensity, functional disability, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction.


Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 participants diagnosed with PMS. Participants were randomly assigned to either the dry needling group (Group A) or the manual stretching group (Group B). Interventions were administered over six weeks, with follow-up assessments conducted ten weeks from baseline. Outcome measures included pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale - VAS), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index - ODI), hip internal rotation ROM, and patient satisfaction (Likert scale).


Results: Both interventions significantly improved all measured outcomes. Group A (Dry Needling) showed a greater reduction in VAS scores from 7.4 at baseline to 3.2 post- intervention and 2.9 at follow-up, compared to Group B (Manual Stretching), which showed a reduction from 7.3 to 4.5 and 3.9, respectively. Group A's ODI scores improved from 56.2% at baseline to 24.5% post-intervention and 22.1% at follow-up, while Group B's scores improved from 55.8% to 30.2% and 28.7%, respectively. ROM in Group A increased from 25.3 degrees to 38.2 degrees post-intervention and 36.9 degrees at follow-up, compared to an increase from 25.1 degrees to 34.7 degrees and 33.2 degrees in Group B. Patient satisfaction was higher in Group A, with scores of 4.7 post-intervention and 4.6 at follow-up, compared to 4.2 and 4.1 in Group B.


Conclusion: Dry needling is a highly effective intervention for managing PMS, providing superior outcomes in pain relief, functional improvement, ROM enhancement, and patient satisfaction compared to manual stretching. These findings suggest that dry needling should be considered a primary treatment modality for PMS. Further research is recommended to confirm these results and explore the long-term effects and broader impacts of these interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Vinod Chauhan

Post Graduate student MPT Sports Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of applied medicines and research (IAMR), 1Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University (ABVMU), Lucknow, India

Dr. Huma Zahoor Ahmed Siddiqui

Associate Professor Department of Physiotherapy Institute of Applied Medicines and research Ghaziabad  

Dr. Monika Sharma

Associate Professor, HOD, Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Applied Medicine And Research (IAMR) Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, Lucknow, India

References

Boyajian-O’Neill LA, McClain RL, Coleman MK, Thomas PP. Diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: an osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008;108(11):657-64.

Hopayian K, Song F, Riera R, Sambandan S. The clinical features of the piriformis syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2095-109.

Papadopoulos EC, Khan SN. Piriformis syndrome and low back pain: a new classification and review of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(1):65-71.

Fishman LM, Anderson C, Rosner B. BOTOX and physical therapy in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81(12):936-42.

Benzon HT, Katz JA, Benzon HP, Iqbal MS. Piriformis syndrome: anatomic considerations, a new injection technique, and a review of the literature. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(6):1442-8.

Hopayian K, Song F, Riera R, Sambandan S. The clinical features of the piriformis syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2095-109

Ahmad Siraj S, Dadgal R. Physiotherapy for Piriformis Syndrome Using Sciatic Nerve Mobilization and Piriformis Release. Cureus. 2022 Dec 26;14(12):e32952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32952. PMID: 36712711; PMCID: PMC9879580.

Dommerholt J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Trigger point dry needling: an evidence and clinical-based approach. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2013.

Shah JP, Thaker N, Heimur J, Aredo JV, Sikdar S, Gerber LH. Myofascial trigger points then and now: a historical and scientific perspective. PM R. 2015;7(7):746-61.

Kalichman L, Vulfsons S. Dry needling in the management of myofascial pain syndrome. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):640-6.

Kietrys DM, Palombaro KM, Azzaretto E, Hubler R, Schaller B, Schlussel JM, Tucker

M. Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(9):620-34.

Tough EA, White AR, Cummings TM, Richards SH, Campbell JL. Acupuncture and dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(3):3-10.

Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17(8):348.

Fishman LM, Dombi GW, Michaelsen C, Ringel S, Rozner B, Rosner B, Weber C. Piriformis syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome—a 10-year study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3):295-301.

Boyajian-O’Neill LA, McClain RL, Coleman MK, Thomas PP. Diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: an osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008;108(11):657-64.

Travell JG, Simons DG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

Similar Articles

<< < 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.