An Efficient and Cost Effective Homogenisation Method for Isolating High Quality RNA from Fish Tissue Samples

Authors

  • Uzma Naseer
  • Ulfat Syed Mir
  • Mohammad Altaf
  • Fayaz Ahmad
  • Ibraq Khurshid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43i1.5212

Keywords:

Tissue Homogenisation, RNA extraction, Fish tissue, Transcriptomics

Abstract

Aquaculture sector has huge economic importance and provides jobs to millions of people
besides providing nutritionally rich food to billions of people around the world. However,
over the years the industry is challenged by various diseases that affect fish health and
productivity, leading to economic losses and food security concerns. It is therefore important
to understand the molecular basis of these diseases and develop new effective strategies.
Transcriptomics is one of the powerful approaches in understanding the pathophysiology at
molecular level. Extraction of the high quality RNA from the fish tissues has always
remained a challenging task for transcriptomic analysis and tissue homogenisation is one of
the initial and the most crucial step in RNA isolation. Here we report an easy, efficient and
affordable method for homogenising fish tissues that yielded high quality RNA from fish
tissues. The applicability of this method was evaluated for downstream applications including
cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR analysis of housekeeping gene GAPDH. The experimental
procedure consistently provided sufficient intact total RNA (n=30) and RIN number between
8.2-9.0.This homogenisation method would be highly useful for aquaculture researchers and
help in understanding the transcriptomic changes in response to diseases or changed habitat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Uzma Naseer

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kashmir

Ulfat Syed Mir

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research & Innovation (CIRI), University of Kashmir   

Mohammad Altaf

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research & Innovation (CIRI), University of Kashmir   

Fayaz Ahmad

Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir

Ibraq Khurshid

Department of Zoology, Central University of Kashmir,   

References

1. FAO 2022, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture .2022. In The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022.

2. Hai, N. V. 2015. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Journal of applied microbiology, 119(4), 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12886

3. Maldonado-Miranda, J. J., Castillo-Pérez, L. J., Ponce-Hernández, A., Carranza-Álvarez, C. 2022. Summary of economic losses due to bacterial pathogens in aquaculture industry. In Bacterial fish diseases (pp. 399-417). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85624-9.00023-3

4. Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Buschmann, A. H., Bush, S. R., Cao, L., Klinger, D. H., Troell, M. 2021. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature, 591(7851), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03736-4

5. Moreno, P., Gemez-Mata, J., Garcia-Rosado, E., Bejar, J., Labella, A. M., Souto, S., Alonso, M. C. 2020. Differential immunogene expression profile of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.) in response to highly and low virulent NNV. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 106, 56-70. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.fsi.2020.06.052

6. Natnan, M. E., Low, C. F., Chong, C. M., Bunawan, H., & Baharum, S. N. 2021. Integration of omics tools for understanding the fish immune response due to microbial challenge. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 668771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.668771

7. Canellas, A. L. B., Costa, W. F., Freitas-Silva, J., Lopes, I. R., de Oliveira, B. F. R., & Laport, M. S. 2022. In sickness and in health: Insights into the application of omics in aquaculture settings under a microbiological perspective. Aquaculture, 554, 738132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022. 738132

8. Gallego Romero I., Pai A. A., Tung J. and Gilad Y. 2014. RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification. BMC Biol 12: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-12-42

9. Portillo, M., Fenoll, C., and Escobar, C. 2006. Evaluation of different RNA extraction methods for small quantities of plant tissue: combined effects of reagent type and homogenization procedure on RNA quality‐integrity and yield. Physiologia Plantarum, 128(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00716.x

10. Dabrowski, P., Rasmus, M., Jundzill, A., Drewa, T., and Pokrywczynska, M. 2024. A comparison of five methods to maximize RNA and DNA isolation yield from adipose tissue. PeerJ, 12, e17071.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-24

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.